Coming out of your PGA Show, I knew that UST was actually going all-in on your Recoil iron shaft. But in spite of all tech talk and marketing and advertising, I couldn't shake a doubts about better people actually switching to graphite iron shafts. Then, as winter started to break and people headed to your course, I started seeing a lot more posts about players gaming the Recoil. Is an absolute sea change underway? Are we headed towards daily when players will have 14 graphite shafts inside their bag?
:: The Recoil Prototype is designed for better players looking designed for great feel and the opportunity to work the ball. It's a lower balance along with higher flex point. It comes in heavier weights (90-125 grams) which has a firmer tip for reduced ball flight.
:: The Recoil 800 Line is for players searching for a lighter weight option (50-94 grams). It features optimum bodyweight and flex profiles to fit numerous golfers. A mid-balance, channel tip creates a medium ball flight.
:: The Recoil 600 Selection offers great feel along with lightweight options (68-84 grams) to enhance club head speed meant for greater distance. This brand favors a medium to medium high ball airfare.
Prices for the Recoil brand vary widely. The Recoil Prototype has an MSRP of $135. A Recoil 800 Series can be $92, and the Recoil nine hundred Series is $53.
The Recoil Prototype and 800 Series are merely available through UST TOURSPX agents, but the 600 Series is available through all UST dealers.
In terms of looks, UST took a safe middle road with the Recoil. From afar, not a soul would guess that these are graphite: they have a shiny silver look that is close enough to material to fool the casual observer. They do have an overabundance of branding than your normal steel shaft, but not a single thing gaudy; a nice clean white and silver graphic that could easily be hidden at address.
When you get the Recoil Prototype 125, there's nothing regarding the feel that says "graphite. " There are plenty of heft in addition to a nice even balance. In the swing, there's a very minimal sum of load and kick; it's a little but noticeable change with a Dynamic Gold. It's at impact that you just really sense the distinction. Mishits have none for the sting and shock associated for you to normally associate with missing the midst of the club face. Focused hits feel even clean than normal, almost because if there was no impact at all.
For the Performance examining, I installed the UST Recoil Prototype 125 shafts into a couple of Wilson FG Tour V2 goes. They were tested against a few Dynamic Gold S300 shafts which installed in the same heads. Testing was done for a FlightScope X2 launch keep track of. All shafts were gripped with PURE Grips.
The 2 biggest differences between the Recoil and Dynamic Precious metal, for me, were the peak level of my shots along with the spin rates. With your Recoil, my shots were peaking typically 10 feet higher than these folks with Dynamic Gold. Strangely enough, the spin rates using Recoil were higher with my long iron (compared so that you can Dynamic Gold) and lower while using short irons. This blend of higher flight with better spin rates led to the distance gains that saw.
When it pertains to accuracy, Recoil and Potent Gold were essentially alike in dispersion. The FlightScope graphic shows a sizable numerical advantage for the Dynamic Gold within the 4 irons, but, examining the shot pattern, a eye test disagrees.
All in all, I think that switching on the Recoil Prototype 125 will be a fairly easy transition for anyone playing some of the heavy weight steel shafts. Considering that there are 19 different Recoil models, there's probably one who would make for an easy transition, or, perhaps, some marked improvement, for nearly every player. If you're getting fit for new irons this season, do what an increasing variety of players are doing, and then judge if your game wouldn't be improved with UST's Recoil in terms of iron shafts.
No comments:
Post a Comment